As an experiment, I have set up this pissing log. And yes, I squirted a bit on it myself. The first chance he got, Solan tried to outdo me. So now the log is broken in.
This is how my life turned out.
In the forest no one can hear you scream.
Here's a funny thing: Commuting by bicycle is easier if you have a car. You can get to work on your bicycle and then use the car to do your shopping in the weekends and other stuff like, I don't know, visiting friends or something in the evenings. If a bicycle is all you've got, on the other hand, you can't suddenly decide to do a lot of stuff at once. If you want to visit someone, you had better do it on your way from work because once you're back home, you'll be too pooped to go out again.
It's cold up north: And pretty dismal in the future.
This is the quickest way to stack poles. It's hard to see here, but the bottom ones rest on a treestump. This way almost no part of any of the poles touch the ground. At the same time they won't tip over, and are well exposed to the air.
Look at almost any picture more than, say, thirty years old of a groups of western people, and you can't help noticing that they look really different from what western people look like now.
Cyclecars, or velomobiles, have always fascinated me. No matter how much you like cycling, there's still something magical about the enclosed, womb-like car. A velomobile seems to have the best of both worlds.
In Sweden during WWII times were good compared to almost anywhere else in Europe, but still no joke. All cars were forcibly " borrowed" for the war effort. So people built their own. On the top here is Johansson's modern build of a model called "Fantom". As many as 100 000 plans for this velomobile may have been sold in Scandinavia during thirty years in print. Above is the extremely unfortunately named "Pedobilen". While the Fantom was made of plywood built around a steel tube frame, the Pedobil was built more like a canoe, with wood and canvas. Below is an excerpt of the plans for Fantom.




Here's a story in the New York Times about three things that interest me a lot: Weird minorities, personal freedom and what to do about the shit you create.
NICKTOWN, Pa. — In 29 years of enforcing sewage laws in Pennsylvania, Jack E. Crislip has never faced violators more adamant, or more pleasant to deal with, than members of the ultraconservative Swartzentruber Amish sect. (Link.)
An interesting proposal: For any off-grid chemist and housewife. (Photo: senseless)
How the other half lives: Phoenix, Arizona. Hermit in forest on the other side of the planet suggests improvements. (Photo: Google Earth.)
Our turn: We got half a tank of gas, some kibble in the trunk and 1049 miles to Anchorage. (Photo: Kristine Nyborg)

Some people just make do. The picture above is taken by road engineer Kjell A. Solberg somewhere on the border between Congo and Tanzania. It is not an art project or made for fun or anything, but for transport. Note the uncanny similarity in design between this one and the Philippene one below, culled from a piece in the blog of Make Magazine.
... but it never really is. Still, I find it impossible not do stare dreamily at stuff like this. From the July, 1946 issue of Popular Mechanics.
This is Helen (1924 - 1995) and Scott (1883 - 1983) Nearing.





Here we are now: Entertain us
A mahmout and his elephant in Thailand. From the series World Animal Day at Big Picture.
Photo: Jørn MoenA few of us around here are still holding out against the chain-saw revolution, relying instead on bow (Swede) saws and elbow grease. I like bow saws because, above all, they are quiet. They use no gasoline or oil, and do not smell; they are light and easy to carry; they have no moving parts to wear out; they're practically indestructible; and they're inexpensive. (...) True, bow saws are slower than chain saws, but that means you spend more time in the forest. They take more work, but when the winter is over they leave you with good, healthy arms. (...)I've done enough sawing to have contracted tennis elbow (city pussy-wussy that I am), so I have taught myself to be amidextrous when it comes to this chore. And whenever I do carpentry I always use my Japanese saws, that cut on the draw instead of on the push.
Occasionally I've considered looking for another type of saw that might beat the bow saw without going to gasoline power. The search usually leads to the big two-man whipsaws that loggers used before the advent of lightweight power saws. My conclusion is that a whipsaw might be useful for working through a log that i too thick for a bow saw, but otherwise wouldn't pay. A whipsaw blade is substantially thicker than a modern bow-saw blade, so it cuts a wider kerf (groove). It takes extra energy to remove the extra wood. Perhaps this is why loggers called the saws "misery whips".

Be sharp: A flat wick the way it's supposed to look.
Not a halo: That's Thor in the back, obscured by his headlight.




I might be giving the impression here that I do nothing up in the woods but consume vast amounts of propane.
Here's me, moving house almost exactly four years ago on my Christiania trike.
Hermit's verdict: On flat surfaces with not too much traffic, there's something undeniably majestic about cruising along on this vehicle.